Press "Enter" to skip to content

Government’s Invincible Weapon: Misogyny

There is a moment where you have to choose whether to be silent or stand up. – Malala Yousafzai

For centuries, women have been struggling to attain the rights and privileges men enjoyed since birth. From opening personal bank accounts to voting for and working in the government, women’s rights activism has come down a long progressive way. At present, society seemed to have advanced in elevating the status of women. As we read through the events of 2022, we realize it is anything but. Decades of social and scientific progress from humanity are dismantling as governments globally weaponize their authority to dictate and control the lives of millions of women around the world.

Stay up to Date – Subscribe to our newsletter.

In June 2022, the US Supreme Court, under the ruling of conservative Justices, three of which were nominated by former president Donald Trump during his presidency, overturned the landmark decision of allowing US states to criminalize abortions. Given the cosmic influence of US politics, several countries have attempted to overrule their abortion bills and pillage the right to abortion. Although protests have occurred with multiple prominent politicians joining in, abortion has been criminalized once again in several US states.

Although abortions are important health procedures, their religious notoriety engendered controversy around them. While medical professionals emphasize its necessity, misinformation professionals choose to focus on the procedure as a birth control method, or a ‘baby-killing’ procedure. These discourses might seem innocuous online, but offline, it is a fatal decision which risks the lives of thousands of women in the US alone, particularly minority women who already face the highest maternal mortality rate in developed countries. These rates could escalate exponentially due to a lack of access to abortion for mothers suffering from complicated pregnancies, or those who choose to not have a baby will seek more precarious measures to miscarry. Women could also be killed by their partners or rapists for carrying the baby to term as women are most vulnerable to abuse during pregnancies. The opportunities for women forced to have children will diminish, pushing many women out of the workforce. There are endless grim realities sprouting from the decision made by a few justices in the Supreme Court which will change the lives of women forever.

In Iran, where women are forced to wear headscarves in public, the government utilizes it to suppress women’s interaction with the public and dictate what they wear. Not adhering to these policies can be fatal, and police brutality against women is the norm. Such was the case on September 16th, when a young woman died of brain injury following a heinous assault from the ‘morality police’. The tragic death of a young woman over a mere head covering sparked mass protests led by women in the country. The protests have become violent as women remove their headscarves to show solidarity with the lives lost and cut their hair. The sheer size of the protests has provoked an internet shutdown, a government crackdown on women’s activists, and assault from police forces with reported fatal cases.

On one side of the world, women are assaulted and killed for covering their hair. While Muslim countries coerce their women into ‘modesty’, non-Muslim counterparts commit to the opposite. Several parliamentary sessions across secular democratic countries such as France and India debate on the right to head coverings in public places including schools and government offices.

These incidents are not a coincidence. Governments are opting to focus on deprecating women’s rights while their countries suffer from political turmoil or financial crises. Nearly always, countries choose to attack women to hide or shift public eyes from their own incompetence. Women’s livelihoods are considered dispensable. Their capabilities and importance remain underestimated or underappreciated. Nevertheless, one must stand to preserve them, as our ancestors have. Women’s Rights are Human Rights!

Sources

Al Jazeera (2022) French senators vote to ban hijab in sports competitions [online] available from <https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2022/1/19/french-senators-vote-to-ban-the-hijab-in-sports-competitions>

Gall, E. (2019) ‘5 Things I’ve Learned from Malala Yousafzai’, Girls’ Globe [online] available from <https://www.girlsglobe.org/2019/07/12/5-things-ive-learned-from-malala-yousafzai/?doing_wp_cron=1664149594.1127951145172119140625>

March of Dimes (2022) Abuse During Pregnancy [online] available from  <https://www.marchofdimes.org/pregnancy/abuse-during-pregnancy.aspx>

Mathew, L. (2022) ‘Opposition Demands Shah Statement on Hijab Row, Walks Out of Lok Sabha’, The Indian Express [online] available from <https://indianexpress.com/article/india/opposition-demands-shah-statement-on-hijab-row-walks-out-of-lok-sabha-7763445/>

Putin’s Basilisk

In 2017, Putin stated that the one who became the leader in AI would be the ruler of the world, adding that it would be undesirable if someone obtained a monopolist position and that Russia would share its discoveries with the rest of the world. It was likely his way of affirming dominance while letting the world know that Russia is ready to expand its intellectual boundaries. Putin even tried monopolizing the crypto market: when the central bank called for a ban on cryptocurrencies, Putin was against this decision. During a call on January 26, a month before invading Ukraine, Putin stated the potential and advantages Russia has in this field. This could have been a first red flag: If Kremlin was already planning an all-out war, they were likely expecting sanctions, hence, giving alternate ways of securing wealth a thought.

The Big Bear is still longing for the Mediterranean (no matter the war)

Russian access to the Mediterranean has been one of the Kremlin's foreign policy goals all along. Not coincidentally, a big conquest in this regard has been the establishment of a naval facility in the city port of Tartus in Syria, which explains also Russia's strong pro-Assad stance. Now it seems that after the war against Ukraine began two months ago, Russian sea activities are not directed only toward the Black Sea, as expected, but even more toward the Mediterranean.

Bosnia’s Flawed Response to EU Enlargement and “Mini-Schengen”

In 2019, the President of Serbia Aleksandar Vucic announced that he, along with Prime Minister of Albania Edi Rama and the Prime Minister of North Macedonia Zoran Zaev, signed a declaration of intent to establish the free movement of people, goods and capital between these three countries in the Western Balkans - a Mini-Schengen, they called it. The response of Bosnia and Herzegovina to the initiative was flawed, to say the least.

The value of thinking about ‘just war’ in a world where war is just war

Talking about the ethics of war over Ukraine seems abstract and naïve in light of Donbas and its abandoned villages. It seems pointless to think about just war in a world of suffering where war is just war. Yet, it is because the suffering of war is real that we should think and talk about the ethics of war. Only when we talk can we take a stance, constrain violence, and hold military leaders accountable.

Be First to Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Quo Vademus
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.