Press "Enter" to skip to content

Why Taliban takeover of Afghanistan should worry the Western Balkan states

As the United States started to pull its troops out of Afghanistan, the Taliban forces saw an opening to start a large offensive 1 deeper into the country, seemingly with the aim of achieving total control. This was not unexpected but what did take people by surprise was the speed and the level of organization by which the Taliban forces took over more and more provinces as well as the weakness of Afghan armed forces in attempts of stopping them. Many have raised legitimate questions whether all the time, money, and energy spent on training the Afghan forces in the past 15 years was worth it, but I will not examine the past. I’m more interested in the future of Afghanistan and what impact that future will have, if any, on Western Balkan states, particularly Bosnia and Herzegovina.

As a result of the Taliban takeover of Afghan provinces, more and more Afghan civilians become internally displaced as they flee their home villages towards the capital city of Kabul. In the case of the Taliban takeover of Kabul, which is a realistic scenario at this point, not only will we see a grave humanitarian situation as Taliban forces punish their political opponents, civil society leaders and women’s rights activists but also a new migration crisis which will inevitably be headed towards Europe.

If that happens, Afghan civilians will permanently be stuck in the Western Balkans, considering the fact that European Union closed its borders in Croatia for illegal migrants coming from the MENA region. As a consequence, the most burden of the illegal migration crisis has been carried by Bosnia and Herzegovina whose dysfunctional internal state system prevents it from placing adequate policies in place to deal with the migration crisis. For example, illegal migrants are not equally distributed across the territory of Bosnia and Herzegovina 2 due to the fact that every Canton has the right to decline to open up migrant centers and shelters in their territory. Additionally, Bosnia and Herzegovina does not have an updated Migration and Asylum strategy that would serve as a guiding star in dealing with the crisis.

Consequently, only Sarajevo Canton and Una-Sana Canton (which borders Croatia), which are Bosniak-dominated Cantons, took in large quantities of illegal migrants and are barely keeping control of it. If Afghan refugees do start moving towards Europe en masse, they will inevitably end up stuck in Bosnia and Herzegovina, a country that cannot protect their basic human rights. For this reason, it is imperative that all government levels of BiH start preparing and adapting policies in place for possible future events as well as to coordinate with other Western Balkans states in order to have a unified response to the future crisis.

I truly do not understand the reasoning of the Biden administration. The “They have to take responsibility for their own country” argument 3 from President Biden is legitimate but you cannot expect to have an organized national response from a country in which the United States still has not finished the process of nation-building, not to mention that the sudden retreat of US forces demoralizes Afghan forces on the ground which are left without appropriate air support. I also understand the “end forever wars” argument but the United States cannot ignore terrorist thugs undoing 20 years of progress in the field of women’s rights and civil society. The international community cannot ignore the fact that if Kabul falls into the hands of the Taliban, Afghanistan will become a safe haven for terror organizations that may plan the next 9/11.

Also, by pulling out your forces, you are handing over the country to the influence of Russia and China who already have started negotiating with the Taliban, giving them legitimacy. If the United States is serious about great power competition, it will not give up on Afghanistan and not allow Russia and China to gain influence across South/Central Asia. Yes, mistakes were made in the past but instead of leaving, the US should stay and do better. Fight for the democratic principles they preach and for a better future for Afghanistan. Because a safe and stable Afghanistan means a safer US homeland as well as a safer Europe.

Sources

Ansari, T., Rust, M., & Mollica, A. (2021, August 13). How the Taliban Takeover of Afghanistan’s Provincial Capitals Is Unfolding. WSJ. https://www.wsj.com/articles/how-the-taliban-takeover-of-afghanistans-provincial-capitals-is-unfolding-11628890519

Monella, L. M. (2021, January 20). What are the real reasons behind Bosnia’s migrant crisis? Euronews. https://www.euronews.com/2021/01/19/what-are-the-real-reasons-behind-bosnia-s-migrant-crisis-bihac

Toosi, N., McLeary, P., & Ward, A. (2021, August 12). Biden on Afghanistan: Not my problem. POLITICO. https://www.politico.com/news/2021/08/11/biden-afghanistan-not-my-problem-503928


Footnotes
  1. Ansari, T., Rust, M., & Mollica, A. (2021, August 13). How the Taliban Takeover of Afghanistan’s Provincial Capitals Is Unfolding. WSJ. https://www.wsj.com/articles/how-the-taliban-takeover-of-afghanistans-provincial-capitals-is-unfolding-11628890519 [>]
  2. Monella, L. M. (2021, January 20). What are the real reasons behind Bosnia’s migrant crisis? Euronews. https://www.euronews.com/2021/01/19/what-are-the-real-reasons-behind-bosnia-s-migrant-crisis-bihac [>]
  3. Toosi, N., McLeary, P., & Ward, A. (2021, August 12). Biden on Afghanistan: Not my problem. POLITICO. https://www.politico.com/news/2021/08/11/biden-afghanistan-not-my-problem-503928 [>]

Locating the Human Rights Discourse and GONGOs Activities in the JDP’s Neo-Ottomanist Quest

This article identifies how the JDP (AKP) instrumentalizes the human rights discourse and the IHH (Humanitarian Relief Foundation) in its quest for neo-Ottoman hegemony. It also questions how the JDP benefits from constructing consent in the foreign land by IHH economically and politically. The main questions this essay raises are: Why does the JDP need such a relationship with an NGO and how should we refer to it?

Annual Letter 2020 – We say thank you!

2020 has for sure had its ups and downs - but there is always a silver lining, even in the most challenging moments. For us at Quo Vademus, being able to go live with our website has been this silver lining. This got us one-step closer to making our dream come true of founding our own think tank and creating a platform for the youth to give them back their voice.

The Spreading Tentacles of Chinese Economic Diplomacy: Ethnic Conflict in Indonesia and Pakistan

In 2014, China’s GDP based on purchasing power parity has overtaken that of the United States. Though the US is still regarded as the world’s major economy, trends are shifting away from the narrative of a post-Cold War hegemony of liberal democracies. In light of such circumstances, this analysis assesses how Chinese development finance and investment in the Global South is shaping both, current geopolitics and the internal structure of Pakistan and Indonesia.

The New START: Discursive effectiveness but little congruence with what it proposes

The extension of the New START has finally come to a happy ending, where the expectations of many have fallen short after failing to reach broad consensuses on START II and III. However, while it is often presented as a positive development that the world’s nuclear armament has been reduced considerably, it is often simultaneously ignored that the ones that remain are more sophisticated and potentially more destructive.

Be First to Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *