Press "Enter" to skip to content

Destroying the Foundation of Democracy under the Mantle of Free Speech

For long enough Facebook, Twitter, YouTube and so many other social media platforms have allowed the creation of echo chambers promoting wild conspiracy theories and false news. If not all the incidents before, at least what happened yesterday, January 6, at the US Capitol should show us that violence, incited through various online disinformation campaigns, has already a long time ago moved from the online to the offline world.

It was not a surprise, not a protest. This was terrorism and it was also not condemned, but rather celebrated, by people across all social media platforms, following the same belief as those terrorists. It could have been foreseen, and while there are still a lot of questions about how this could have happened, there is no question about where it all started. At the same place where, yesterday, you could see messages such as “The show begins, enjoy it” popping up all over the place. The same place which is full of fake news trending under the Hashtag #Antifa, spreading the word that the attack was not carried out by Trump Supporters but by the Antifa itself. Baseless, as always, but still trending.

Stay up to Date – Subscribe to our newsletter.

Facebook and Twitter started banning groups and accounts associated with various conspiracy theories just a couple of months ago. A step in the right direction, but way too late and the current situation by far passed the point of no return. It allowed certain individuals to group and to structure themselves, beyond a point where banning or suspending the private account of the President of the United States would, temporarily, contain the problem.

Marking fake-news articles as such to defeat a movement that labels independent fact-checkers as “mainstream” and, in their opinion, as part of the problem is not enough. It is not going to solve the underlying issue. A self-experiment showed me that one can easily get an account warning, based on “harassment and bullying”, for calling people out. Yet, reporting accounts and posts for spreading debunked fake news and calls for violence, such as calling for the execution of President-Elect Joe Biden, has virtually no impact, and these posts are rarely taken down.

Social media platforms operate on the mission of bringing people together, and that is precisely what happened. For a long time, they brought people with the same mindset together, and through little to no content regulations they gave those people a platform where they can work on destroying the foundation of democracy under the mantle of free speech. They gave a platform to the people who shout the loudest.

The global disinformation campaign is a virus and social media is hosting it. Do not get me wrong, conspiracy theories and disinformation exist for a long time and it needs people like Donald J. Trump to feed information to followers. But today’s social media is helping these theories to spread even faster. The problem is not technology, but the people behind it. You can engage in various interesting discussions, a reason why we love social media, but there is a point where free speech ends: and this is when people are purposely misled or even worse, harmed.

Tech companies could help and contribute to upholding democracy, without facing a serious impact on their platforms. Social media will flourish even without conspiracy theories. But still, there are a thousand posts out there spreading conspiracy theories, baseless claims, and fake news. Thousand of accounts retweeting and sharing those same posts, operating for weeks and months. Spreading the ideologies of a movement that was previously called a domestic terrorism threat by the Federal Bureau of Investigation.

This world, offline as well as online, should not provide any place for fascism. As an Austrian citizen, believe me, I had to learn early on what can happen if you give racists a free space to spread. History shows us and we keep ignoring it.

Transformation in Russian Civil Society

This analysis studies the transformations in Russian civil society from the eighteenth through the twenty-first century. It argues that powerful political structures, formed during the Imperial, Soviet and post-Soviet periods, have influenced civil society arrangements in the modern-day Russian Federation. Similar to Russian forms of democracy and the market economy, which diverge substantially from Western European models, civil society as it exists in the RussianFederation has not followed the West’s trajectory of development. This Russian iteration of civil society, which emerged after the collapse of the Soviet Union, is the result of successive transformations across social sectors over several centuries and is justified through various factors unique to the Russian socio-political context.

Springtime for Democracy : Turkey’s Election Promises a New Chapter

On May 14, Turkey will elect its 13th president. The question on everyone's mind is whether the united opposition's efforts will be enough to oust the incumbent, Erdoğan. The upcoming presidential and parliamentary election, with its more than 60 million registered voters, is considered to be the turning point in Turkey’s seventy-year-old history as an electoral democracy.

Annual Letter 2020 – We say thank you!

2020 has for sure had its ups and downs - but there is always a silver lining, even in the most challenging moments. For us at Quo Vademus, being able to go live with our website has been this silver lining. This got us one-step closer to making our dream come true of founding our own think tank and creating a platform for the youth to give them back their voice.

The questionable status of the Polish Opposition

Amidst a raging pandemic, the Polish government published the decision by the Constitutional Tribunal in October 2020, which makes abortions in the instance of severe and irreversible impairment of the fetus illegal. Unsurprisingly people are on the streets, protest, rebel or decide to organise bottom-up dispersed forms of activism. However, the existence of these movements in themselves is not enough to create a strong counter system for the ruling, right-wing party PiS and thus the question: where is the opposition?

Be First to Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *