Press "Enter" to skip to content

Destroying the Foundation of Democracy under the Mantle of Free Speech

For long enough Facebook, Twitter, YouTube and so many other social media platforms have allowed the creation of echo chambers promoting wild conspiracy theories and false news. If not all the incidents before, at least what happened yesterday, January 6, at the US Capitol should show us that violence, incited through various online disinformation campaigns, has already a long time ago moved from the online to the offline world.

It was not a surprise, not a protest. This was terrorism and it was also not condemned, but rather celebrated, by people across all social media platforms, following the same belief as those terrorists. It could have been foreseen, and while there are still a lot of questions about how this could have happened, there is no question about where it all started. At the same place where, yesterday, you could see messages such as “The show begins, enjoy it” popping up all over the place. The same place which is full of fake news trending under the Hashtag #Antifa, spreading the word that the attack was not carried out by Trump Supporters but by the Antifa itself. Baseless, as always, but still trending.

Stay up to Date – Subscribe to our newsletter.

Facebook and Twitter started banning groups and accounts associated with various conspiracy theories just a couple of months ago. A step in the right direction, but way too late and the current situation by far passed the point of no return. It allowed certain individuals to group and to structure themselves, beyond a point where banning or suspending the private account of the President of the United States would, temporarily, contain the problem.

Marking fake-news articles as such to defeat a movement that labels independent fact-checkers as “mainstream” and, in their opinion, as part of the problem is not enough. It is not going to solve the underlying issue. A self-experiment showed me that one can easily get an account warning, based on “harassment and bullying”, for calling people out. Yet, reporting accounts and posts for spreading debunked fake news and calls for violence, such as calling for the execution of President-Elect Joe Biden, has virtually no impact, and these posts are rarely taken down.

Social media platforms operate on the mission of bringing people together, and that is precisely what happened. For a long time, they brought people with the same mindset together, and through little to no content regulations they gave those people a platform where they can work on destroying the foundation of democracy under the mantle of free speech. They gave a platform to the people who shout the loudest.

The global disinformation campaign is a virus and social media is hosting it. Do not get me wrong, conspiracy theories and disinformation exist for a long time and it needs people like Donald J. Trump to feed information to followers. But today’s social media is helping these theories to spread even faster. The problem is not technology, but the people behind it. You can engage in various interesting discussions, a reason why we love social media, but there is a point where free speech ends: and this is when people are purposely misled or even worse, harmed.

Tech companies could help and contribute to upholding democracy, without facing a serious impact on their platforms. Social media will flourish even without conspiracy theories. But still, there are a thousand posts out there spreading conspiracy theories, baseless claims, and fake news. Thousand of accounts retweeting and sharing those same posts, operating for weeks and months. Spreading the ideologies of a movement that was previously called a domestic terrorism threat by the Federal Bureau of Investigation.

This world, offline as well as online, should not provide any place for fascism. As an Austrian citizen, believe me, I had to learn early on what can happen if you give racists a free space to spread. History shows us and we keep ignoring it.

Tensions between Armenia and Azerbaijan

In summer 2020, the decade-long tensions between Armenia and Azerbaijan over the territory of Nagorno-Karabakh flared up once again, and the countries are on the verge of another full-scale war. Another conflict in Nagorno-Karabakh may endanger the security and stability of the whole region, as well as lead to tensions between the involved actors on both sides, mainly Russia, Turkey and Iran. The EU, event though Armenia and Azerbaijan are both EU partner countries under the Eastern Partnership, has been largely inactive in this issue in the past. It should therefore mobilize all its efforts to bring about a sustainable political solution, and avoid another frozen conflict in its backyard.

Is there a Global Post Colony?

Uniting all post-colonies as a global post-colony is a notion that diminishes the historical, historiographical and cultural differences present in each post-colony around the world. Therefore, unifying colonial legacies and treating them as a homogenised unit disregards their experiences, which damages their diverse yet relative historical progress. Instead, one should aim for an alternative perception of understanding a global post-colony, as the idea is not completely unworkable but provides a strong epistemological foundation to combat Western hegemonic discourses.

Unanimity is killing the EU

Time and again, voices from in- and outside the EU demanded for the Council of the EU to move from unanimous decision-making in matters of foreign and security policy to qualified majority voting. Moreover, concerns have been voiced that the block's unanimity requirement seriously impedes its ability to act fast and step up as a reliable and credible global actor in a fast-changing world. Nevertheless, even though these calls for a decision-making reform are not new, it is unlikely that the rules will change anytime soon and that the EU will move to qualified majority voting in crucial areas such as foreign and security policy.

It’s not NATO threatening Russia – Democracy is

The claim that Putin feels threatened by NATO is not only the key argument of political scientist Mearsheimer and it has also been picked up and replicated by Russian propaganda. However, various scholars and experts on the region disagree with this notion of NATO threatening Russia. Instead, some argue, it is democracy that poses a threat to Putin and his regime and that fear of flourishing democracy in Russia's neighbourhood is part of the explanation for the Russian invasion in 2014 and 2022.

Be First to Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *