Press "Enter" to skip to content

The Transatlantic Partnership – At a crossroads, once again

EU-Transatlantic relations are at a crossroads. In fact, they have been there time and again in the past four years. And yet, here we are again.

The EU-Transatlantic partnership could build serious momentum in 2020. The upcoming US presidential elections could once again change the course of US foreign policy and set a different direction for future EU-US relations. Or it could lead to an even deeper divide between these two former partners.

Over the past four years, during Donald Trump’s presidency, the decade-old EU-Transatlantic relationship suffered serious setbacks. New, seemingly insurmountable discrepancies between the two global powers emerged.

While EU institutions and the majority of EU governments continued to advocate for liberal democracy, protection of human rights and the rule of law, on the other side of the Atlantic, it seemed that the White House had already written off these values. Instead, nationalism, populism and attack against global institutions are currently “en vogue”.

Stay up to Date – Subscribe to our newsletter.

The Trump Administration set an unprecedented example of how a global power can retreat from multilateralism, praise other leaders who rule with autocratic tendencies while discrediting and raging against the left.

He praised the United Kingdom’s exit from the European Union and the work of Hungarian Prime Minister Orbán, who received criticism from various EU leaders for his illiberal, authoritarian way of governing. Trump also pledged to build a border wall and attracted attention for his cruel, inhumane immigration policies – which arguably violate asylum rights. In addition, he criticized NATO, calling it obsolete and questioned whether the EU lives up to its financial obligations to NATO.

If anything, the past four years made it clear that the EU needs to be more self-reliant. With an unreliable partner to the west and an adversary to the east, it became obvious that, in the future, the EU has to act more independently. Also, in terms of military defence. Especially in times of Russian aggression, threats of cyberwar, and hybrid warfare, it is paramount that the block develops the necessary capabilities to defend itself – autonomously.

Moreover, the EU needs to continue upholding and securing basic democratic principles and liberal values – in the EU as well as beyond its own borders. It has to step in to lead as an example when other actors, such as the current Trump administration, obviously cannot.

Whether Biden will be able to secure enough votes to replace Trump in the White House remains questionable. If so, it is still written in the stars whether the Transatlantic partnership can be revived.

If Trump wins the elections in November and stays for another four-year long term, the outlook is rather dark. And not only for the already negatively affected EU-Transatlantic partnership. Also, the prospect for liberal values, the rule of law, and democratic principles is quite sobering.

Four years ago, the EU-US relationship stood at a crossroads. Now, it finds itself in the same state again. So the question remains whether there will be a change for the better. Or if we continue spiralling down the rabbit hole, as we did for the past four years.

 

Viktor Orbán’s racist rhetoric and his propagation of the “great replacement theory”

Hungarian prime minister Viktor Orbán has been known for his racist sentiments for years. However, his most recent remarks during a speech in Băile Tușnad, a town in Romania where Hungarian minorities live, nevertheless sparked outrage due to their outright racist nature. 

The impact of online Islamophobic discourse on offline anti-Muslim hate-crime

Although online hate speech is deeply rooted in Islamophobic sentiments and exhibits distinct characteristics from offline forms of abuse or violence, substantial evidence supports the assertion that online hate speech serves as a catalyst for offline actions. Amidst the proliferation of Islamophobic discourse in online spaces, the dissemination of fake news and misinformation thrives within echo chambers, perpetuating a cycle of prejudice and intolerance.

Cyber politics: ontology as a disadvantage

We live in an era of transitional cyber politics, a reality where cyber avatars are making politics, while society is lost in solipsist cracks. The 21st century is the time of revolution during the evolution, but where will it take us? This is the greatest challenge of modern society.

“Ups, we did it again” – What EU (in)action on Belarus tells us about the EU as a „global actor”

Looking at recent developments in Belarus in August 2020 and the EU's slow response, it becomes again clear that the EU needs a thorough reform in its CFSP decision-making to step up its game as a global actor and normative power.

Be First to Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Quo Vademus
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.