Press "Enter" to skip to content

The Polish Politics of Confusion – The First Fragment: The Population’s Trust

On the 4th of January the Polish Prime Minister Mateusz Morawiecki, a member of the right-wing political party PiS, held a Q and A session on Facebook, where he answered some questions regarding the government’s plans for 2021. He spoke about, what he referred to as, the ‘new polish order’, which revolved around ‘beating the pandemic in the next two, four, five months and then rising again through kick-starting investments and putting more money into the development of the economy including gastronomy and services’ (mjz/tr, 2021). Some received this speech as a reassurance, yet a vast majority approached the statement with scepticism and mistrust, caused mainly by the fact that throughout 2020 the government has often released numerous statements, which later turned out to be untrue, reversed, forgotten or held some hidden agendas, and did not, in the end, have any benefit to the society at all.

Stay up to Date – Subscribe to our newsletter.

This type of behaviour of releasing confusing or vague claims to the public realm has been a strategy taken by the government for quite some time, but truly came to light this year when, more so than ever, the society, which found itself in a precarious environment, looked to the ruling party for support and help. The effects of these actions were in some cases mild, like when the government prohibited to go outdoors on the evening of New Years (Berenda 2020). Upon hearing the news, many rose to protest against, not only the fact that forbidding the freedom of movement is an act of breaking a constitutional right (BusinessInsider, 2020), but also against the fact that they saw the prohibition as a contradiction to the statements made by Mateusz Morawiecki himself, as he claimed that Poland has already managed to overcome the spread of the virus and ‘win the battle with the pandemic’ (Kublik, 2020). In addition to that, many of those involved in the strike expressed their confusion about the fact that, less than two months ago, the Prime Minister himself stated that ‘the government is not there to tell people how to live’ (Zygiel, 2020). The government immediately retracted the word “prohibition”, which only sparked more misunderstanding, but the debate was quickly settled.

In other cases, however, the confounding actions of the government have caused a severe strain. One example includes the way the government remained vague about whose interest they are actually supporting when they hinted at, but never actually introduced, the state of emergency in Poland in relation to the pandemic, as this would mean that many individuals and businesses would be entitled to claim financial support, which the ruling party prefers to avoid to pay out (KBB, 2020). It left many struggling for money and trying to make ends meet in one lockdown after another with no clear direction, game plan or support. This was further exacerbated by their threat to veto the EU budget for 2021, which, if done, would have caused irreversible damage to the Polish economy.

It is no surprise that the politics of confusion caused damaged to the population’s trust. The Poles find themselves in a difficult situation. Who can truly help them recover in 2021? This question remains unanswered.

Sources

Berenda, K., 2020. Zakaz Wychodzenia Z Domu W Sylwestra: Będą Wyjątki. [online] Rmf24.pl. Available at: <https://www.rmf24.pl/raporty/raport-koronawirus-z-chin/polska/news-zakaz-wychodzenia-z-domu-w-sylwestra-beda-wyjatki,nId,4935109> [Accessed 5 January 2021].

BusinessInsider, 2020. Koronawirus Wymusi Stan Nadzwyczajny? To Oznaczałoby Daleko Idące Ograniczenie Praw I Wolności. [online] Business Insider. Available at: <https://businessinsider.com.pl/firmy/przepisy/koronawirus-w-polsce-stan-wyjatkowy-i-stan-kleski-zywiolowej-ograniczenia/gsh3bz3> [Accessed 5 January 2021].

Kublik, A., 2020. Wyborcza.Pl. [online] Wyborcza.pl. Available at: <https://wyborcza.pl/7,75398,26562356,tak-wladza-bagatelizowala-pandemie-i-chwalila-sie-nikt-nam.html?disableRedirects=true> [Accessed 5 January 2021].

KBB, 2020. Co Rząd Zrobi Z Pandemią? Zdaniem Politologa Protesty Ograniczyły Pulę Możliwych Rozwiązań. [online] www.money.pl. Available at: <https://www.money.pl/gospodarka/co-rzad-zrobi-z-pandemia-protesty-ograniczyly-pule-mozliwych-rozwiazan-6569884927437504a.html> [Accessed 5 January 2021].

mjz/tr, 2021. Premier Zapowiada “Nowy Polski Ład” Na Czas “Popandemicznej Normalności”. [online] TVN24. Available at: <https://tvn24.pl/polska/koronawirus-w-polsce-premier-mateusz-morawiecki-zapowiada-nowy-polski-lad-4920587> [Accessed 5 January 2021].

Zygiel, A., 2020. Morawiecki: Wierzyliśmy, Że Pandemia Jest W Odwrocie. Ja Tak Wierzyłem. [online] Rmf24.pl. Available at: <https://www.rmf24.pl/raporty/raport-koronawirus-z-chin/polska/news-morawiecki-wierzylismy-ze-pandemia-jest-w-odwrocie-ja-tak-wi,nId,4856657> [Accessed 5 January 2021].

The EU-Turkey Statement – A human rights violation by design?

2015 brought an unprecedented challenge to EU leaders and governments when they had to develop political solutions to the so-called "migration crisis". For lack of quick fixes or better alternatives, they rushed to negotiate a deal with Turkey, which came to be known as EU-Turkey Statement. The "deal", however, not only lacks any long-term sustainable solution to the challenge and made the EU cut a deal with an unreliable, authoritarian "partner" but, more importantly, outright violates refugees' human rights.

Orbán is performing a balancing act over Russia’s invasion of Ukraine 

Ever since Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, the Hungarian prime minister Orbán is having a hard time balancing his close relationship with Moscow while at the same time supporting EU measures against Russia and the condemnation of Russian aggression. Even though Hungary did not veto the EU's sanction package on Russia, the country refuses to supply weapons and allow weapons transport through the country. Moreover, the government continues to reiterate that it is important to "keep the peace", without mentioning the aggressor who started this war: Putin.

AUKUS: Will the new security triangle suffice to counter China?

Australia has just become part of something momentous in the Indo-Pacific: a maritime super-region at the epicentre of strategic competition between the United States and China. The new tripartite security grouping between Australia, the UK and the US, called AUKUS, deepens the long-standing relationship between three of the world's most multicultural democracies. While the creation of the newly-formed AUKUS is a significant development in the geopolitical environment of the Indo-Pacific, adding more power will be vital in building a balance against China’s power.

Locating the Human Rights Discourse and GONGOs Activities in the JDP’s Neo-Ottomanist Quest

This article identifies how the JDP (AKP) instrumentalizes the human rights discourse and the IHH (Humanitarian Relief Foundation) in its quest for neo-Ottoman hegemony. It also questions how the JDP benefits from constructing consent in the foreign land by IHH economically and politically. The main questions this essay raises are: Why does the JDP need such a relationship with an NGO and how should we refer to it?

Be First to Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Quo Vademus
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.