Press "Enter" to skip to content

Italy’s complex domestic situation

In a short time, Prime Minister Mario Draghi cleared the chain of command from the previous government under Guiseppe Conte: the delegation to the Secret Services was entrusted to the Police Chief Franco Gabrielli, Fabrizio Curcio was appointed as Civil Protection Chief, and finally, Commissioner Domenico Arcuri, who managed the Covid-19 emergency to date, was replaced by Army General Francesco Paolo Figliuolo. This is consistent with the premises that accompanied the establishment of the new government, characterized by the central role of the Prime Minister and his collaborators and the two main objectives: reach herd immunity and reignite the Italian economy through the Next Generation EU investments. To do this, the former president of the ECB involved all main political forces, sharing roles equally within the government, but making sure that central positions for vaccination and investment planning were assigned to professionals not connected to politics.

Stay up to Date – Subscribe to our newsletter.

The presence of politicians in the executive has only a preventive and facilitating function. Draghi wants to share the responsibilities of a possible failure and minimize the risk of insubordination and flight forward of the parties. Nevertheless, the division of roles teaches something, especially regarding the balance of power between the two main political forces: the “5 Star Movement (5SM)” and the “League”.

The 5 Star Movement is the great loser of the government crisis. They have lost control over the Prime Minister, the Ministry of Economic Development and the Ministry of Environment. Therefore, they saw the creation of the much-desired Ministry for Ecological Transition without being able to manage it personally.

The ecological transition plan (required to have access to European funds) was assigned to a physicist and entrepreneur, Roberto Cingolani, to ensure pragmatism and a friendly attitude to the needs of the industries. The reason behind 5SM’s loss of power is simple. Italy is eighth among the world economic powers and third in the European Union. It remains, despite all the problems, indispensable for the Eurozone, especially for the German supply chain.

The 5 Star Movement is the biggest party in parliament and its support was needed to legitimize the new government. However, its internal crisis, story and ideals make it unreliable from a business point of view.

For this reason, Draghi also wanted Matteo Salvini’s League in the government. According to the polls, this party is the most popular in the country, and it traditionally is the closest to business groups. Above all, it rules in the majority of Italy’s regions. It is, therefore, no coincidence that the League obtained the very important Ministry of Economic Development and the creation of the Ministry for Tourism (which represents 13% of Italian GDP). From this standpoint, even Salvini’s pro-European turn is not surprising. It’s functional to the pursuit of the interests of entrepreneurs in Northern Italy, which remains the economic heart of the country and will be, by all means, the main recipient of government interventions. A few months from now, we will likely see an overall reorganization of the political landscape, which will affect how and where the money from the Recovery Fund will be spent.


AGI [online]: “Draghi’s strategy to beat the covid” – available at

Euronews [online]: “With Draghi, Italy has a chance to set aside Conte’s economic misadventures” – available at

Il Corriere della Sera [online]: “Prodi at Dataroom: «Draghi last chance for Italy. Salvini pro-European? Who would have thought” – available at

Il Fatto Quotidiano [online]: “Salvini: “I converted to Europeanism? I leave these labels to others. I had contact with Renzi and Di Maio, not with Pd. But we will have them” – available at

Il Post [online]: “Who is Fabrizio Curcio, the new head of the Civil Protection” – available at

Il Post [online]: “Dissidents within the 5 Star Movement” – available at

Il Sole24Ore [online]: “Draghi government: here is the team of ministers” – available at

La Repubblica [online]: “Draghi replaces Arcuri, General Figliuolo is the new Covid emergency commissioner” – available at

La Stampa [online]: “Draghi government, the team of undersecretaries ready: 7 to the League, 6 to the Democratic Party and 11 to the M5S” – available at

Politico [online]: EU recovery fund deal may get money flowing in summer – available at

Youtube [online]: Draghi’s speech at Meeting di Rimini 2020 – available at

Youtube [online]: “Northern Italy vs Southern Italy? – VI Festival of Limes” – available at

An Analysis of the Final 2020 US-Presidential Debate

On Thursday, 22nd October 2020, the final presidential debate between President Donald Trump and former Vice-President Joe Biden took place in Nashville. Kristen Welker of NBC News moderated the discussion. The debate covered six topics, amongst others, the COVID-19 pandemic, national security, the economy, and race in America. The debate was more orderly than the first presidential debate.

Europe’s Shift to the Right

Two colossal wars in less than half a century engendered the concept of a unified Europe under one supranational institution – the European Union. Yet, European countries are now once again electing right-wing leaders. What does it mean for Europe's relations with the EU and the rest of the world?

The UK’s tilt to the Indo-Pacific: what concrete implications for Australia?

50 years after the then UK defence secretary Denis Healey announced Britain’s retreat from the Indo-Pacific in 1968, the UK is once again drawn into the geoeconomic and geostrategic challenges of the maritime region. This desire to extend Britain's strategic horizon was accelerated by the vote to leave the EU in 2016. In particular, the decision to leave the European single market has forced Downing Street to strengthen its trading relationships with partners beyond the EU - a considerable number of which reside in the Indo-Pacific region.

Corruption in Europe and beyond – A threat to democracy, peace and stability?

Corruption, often represented as an issue that only developing countries would have to deal with, actually exists in the global north and south. It is, therefore, a worldwide concern and poses significant challenges to peace, stability and democracy as well as social equality and development around the globe. Thus, multilateral institutions and global leaders will have to step up their game to finally break cycles of corruption and bring about sustainable development.

Be First to Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *