Press "Enter" to skip to content

Italy’s complex domestic situation

In a short time, Prime Minister Mario Draghi cleared the chain of command from the previous government under Guiseppe Conte: the delegation to the Secret Services was entrusted to the Police Chief Franco Gabrielli, Fabrizio Curcio was appointed as Civil Protection Chief, and finally, Commissioner Domenico Arcuri, who managed the Covid-19 emergency to date, was replaced by Army General Francesco Paolo Figliuolo. This is consistent with the premises that accompanied the establishment of the new government, characterized by the central role of the Prime Minister and his collaborators and the two main objectives: reach herd immunity and reignite the Italian economy through the Next Generation EU investments. To do this, the former president of the ECB involved all main political forces, sharing roles equally within the government, but making sure that central positions for vaccination and investment planning were assigned to professionals not connected to politics.

Stay up to Date – Subscribe to our newsletter.

The presence of politicians in the executive has only a preventive and facilitating function. Draghi wants to share the responsibilities of a possible failure and minimize the risk of insubordination and flight forward of the parties. Nevertheless, the division of roles teaches something, especially regarding the balance of power between the two main political forces: the “5 Star Movement (5SM)” and the “League”.

The 5 Star Movement is the great loser of the government crisis. They have lost control over the Prime Minister, the Ministry of Economic Development and the Ministry of Environment. Therefore, they saw the creation of the much-desired Ministry for Ecological Transition without being able to manage it personally.

The ecological transition plan (required to have access to European funds) was assigned to a physicist and entrepreneur, Roberto Cingolani, to ensure pragmatism and a friendly attitude to the needs of the industries. The reason behind 5SM’s loss of power is simple. Italy is eighth among the world economic powers and third in the European Union. It remains, despite all the problems, indispensable for the Eurozone, especially for the German supply chain.

The 5 Star Movement is the biggest party in parliament and its support was needed to legitimize the new government. However, its internal crisis, story and ideals make it unreliable from a business point of view.

For this reason, Draghi also wanted Matteo Salvini’s League in the government. According to the polls, this party is the most popular in the country, and it traditionally is the closest to business groups. Above all, it rules in the majority of Italy’s regions. It is, therefore, no coincidence that the League obtained the very important Ministry of Economic Development and the creation of the Ministry for Tourism (which represents 13% of Italian GDP). From this standpoint, even Salvini’s pro-European turn is not surprising. It’s functional to the pursuit of the interests of entrepreneurs in Northern Italy, which remains the economic heart of the country and will be, by all means, the main recipient of government interventions. A few months from now, we will likely see an overall reorganization of the political landscape, which will affect how and where the money from the Recovery Fund will be spent.

Sources

AGI [online]: “Draghi’s strategy to beat the covid” – available at https://bit.ly/3bqz5ta

Euronews [online]: “With Draghi, Italy has a chance to set aside Conte’s economic misadventures” – available at https://bit.ly/3crizZp

Il Corriere della Sera [online]: “Prodi at Dataroom: «Draghi last chance for Italy. Salvini pro-European? Who would have thought” – available at https://bit.ly/38jCOXF

Il Fatto Quotidiano [online]: “Salvini: “I converted to Europeanism? I leave these labels to others. I had contact with Renzi and Di Maio, not with Pd. But we will have them” – available at https://bit.ly/2PJ8Qpw

Il Post [online]: “Who is Fabrizio Curcio, the new head of the Civil Protection” – available at https://bit.ly/3qm0VLm

Il Post [online]: “Dissidents within the 5 Star Movement” – available at https://bit.ly/3c9zwHz

Il Sole24Ore [online]: “Draghi government: here is the team of ministers” – available at https://bit.ly/30B9dop

La Repubblica [online]: “Draghi replaces Arcuri, General Figliuolo is the new Covid emergency commissioner” – available at https://bit.ly/30qxttb

La Stampa [online]: “Draghi government, the team of undersecretaries ready: 7 to the League, 6 to the Democratic Party and 11 to the M5S” – available at https://bit.ly/3t2dUno

Politico [online]: EU recovery fund deal may get money flowing in summer – available at https://politi.co/3v7vAzN

Youtube [online]: Draghi’s speech at Meeting di Rimini 2020 – available at https://bit.ly/2OvW6Sr

Youtube [online]: “Northern Italy vs Southern Italy? – VI Festival of Limes” – available at https://bit.ly/3ewKBFx

A Rogue Libertarian on Sustainable Development

There is something named ‘sustainable development’. A kind of development that lets us fulfil all our needs without compromising the needs of those that will come after us thanks to a balance between economic development, environment care, and social wellbeing. That’s the way to go for humanity if we are to arrive in 2050 with acceptable - not comfortable - living conditions.How to achieve it? Not with many libertarians on the planet, to be honest. Authorities - namely the State -  have to take the lead and step in with regulations and enforcement to actually achieve anything by the sorts of sustainable development, because our little rebel minds just won’t.

The Authoritarian Regime as China’s Top Export

China’s global prominence is not only because it is the largest provider of commodities and manufactured goods. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has been equally successful in terms of politics and diplomacy, and it manages to do so by selling its authoritarian model across the globe. Whereas developing and fragile states are more susceptible to it, also Western democracies have been receiving these implicit totalitarian elements.

China in the Pacific: How is Beijing flexing its power in the region

The Pacific Islands and their vast expanse of ocean have never been a major source of traditional military threats. The post-World War Two security architecture of the Pacific has historically been dominated by the United States. Yet today, China’s diplomatic and economic push into the Pacific is incrementally reshaping the strategic landscape. While its presence in the region is not new, Beijing has capitalised on the dissonance between Washington and the Pacific Island nations by steadily and significantly expanding its commercial and geopolitical clout. As a result, ten of the fourteen Pacific Island nations now recognise the One China policy, which warrants considerable attention from the United States and other regional actors such as Australia.

What does the US withdrawal from Afghanistan mean for NATO?

By pulling out of Afghanistan, Joe Biden has put an end to 20 years of U.S. troop involvement in Afghanistan and thus to Washington's "forever war" in the mountainous, landlocked country. This strategic decision leaves the democratically elected government in Kabul struggling to hold on to power. The withdrawal of US and NATO troops is therefore likely to fuel an assortment of security and geostrategic consequences contrary to Euro-Atlantic interests.

Be First to Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *